Objective: To review published criteria for specifically evaluating health related information on the world wide web, and to identify areas of consensus.
Design: Search of world wide web sites and peer reviewed medical journals for explicit criteria for evaluating health related information on the web, using Medline and Lexis-Nexis databases, and the following internet search engines: Yahoo!, Excite, Altavista, Webcrawler, HotBot, Infoseek, Magellan Internet Guide, and Lycos. Criteria were extracted and grouped into categories.
Results: 29 published rating tools and journal articles were identified that had explicit criteria for assessing health related web sites. Of the 165 criteria extracted from these tools and articles, 132 (80%) were grouped under one of 12 specific categories and 33 (20%) were grouped as miscellaneous because they lacked specificity or were unique. The most frequently cited criteria were those dealing with content, design and aesthetics of site, disclosure of authors, sponsors, or developers, currency of information (includes frequency of update, freshness, maintenance of site), authority of source, ease of use, and accessibility and availability.
Conclusions: Results suggest that many authors agree on key criteria for evaluating health related web sites, and that efforts to develop consensus criteria may be helpful. The next step is to identify and assess a clear, simple set of consensus criteria that the general public can understand and use.
Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Maxfield A. Kim P, et al. West J Med. 1999 Jun;170(6):329-32. West J Med. 1999. PMID: 18751150 Free PMC article.
Li L, Irvin E, Guzmán J, Bombardier C. Li L, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 1;26(5):545-57. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00020. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001. PMID: 11242383
Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Jadad AR, et al. JAMA. 1998 Feb 25;279(8):611-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.8.611. JAMA. 1998. PMID: 9486757 Review.
Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Eysenbach G, et al. JAMA. 2002 May 22-29;287(20):2691-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691. JAMA. 2002. PMID: 12020305 Review.
Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. J Med Internet Res. 2002 Dec;4(3):E15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.3.e15. J Med Internet Res. 2002. PMID: 12554546 Free PMC article.
Alexa JM, Richter M, Bertsche T. Alexa JM, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 21;25:e45582. doi: 10.2196/45582. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37342085 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Khalid A, Chowdhury N, Chowdhury MZ, Turin TC. Khalid A, et al. J Migr Health. 2022 Sep 13;6:100131. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100131. eCollection 2022. J Migr Health. 2022. PMID: 36164292 Free PMC article.
Busse TS, Nitsche J, Kernebeck S, Jux C, Weitz J, Ehlers JP, Bork U. Busse TS, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(14):8309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148309. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35886158 Free PMC article.
Kantor D, Farlow M, Ludolph A, Montaner J, Sankar R, Sawyer RN Jr, Stocchi F, Lara A, Clark S, Deschet K, Ouyahia L, Hadjiat Y. Kantor D, et al. Interact J Med Res. 2022 Jun 9;11(1):e35698. doi: 10.2196/35698. Interact J Med Res. 2022. PMID: 35485280 Free PMC article.
Mallappa S, Soobrah R. Mallappa S, et al. Cureus. 2022 Jan 3;14(1):e20897. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20897. eCollection 2022 Jan. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35004076 Free PMC article.